UFC 300 has finally revealed its main event: Alex Pereira defending his UFC light heavyweight title against Jamahal Hill. The matchup carries significant weight as Hill, the former champion, looks to solidify his reign after a forced hiatus due to injury. It’s a chance for Pereira to avenge his mentor’s loss and assert his dominance in the division.

The announcement has sparked debates about whether the main event is the best fight on the card. ESPN MMA correspondents Marc Raimondi, Brett Okamoto, and Jeff Wagenheim weigh in with their insights, highlighting the depth and variety of fights on offer.

Marc Raimondi: Raimondi commends the UFC for making the right decision in selecting Pereira vs. Hill as the main event. He emphasizes the depth of UFC 300, stating that while it may not boast a blockbuster name like Brock Lesnar or Conor McGregor, it stands as one of the deepest cards in recent memory.

Brett Okamoto: Okamoto acknowledges that Pereira vs. Hill might not be the most anticipated fight individually, but he recognizes Pereira’s deserving spot in the spotlight. He points out that UFC 300 is about the collective experience rather than a single marquee matchup, and Pereira’s headline status reflects the sum of the card’s parts.

Jeff Wagenheim: Wagenheim agrees that while the main event may not be mind-blowing, UFC 300 offers a plethora of strong and intriguing fights. He critiques Dana White’s promise of blowing minds, emphasizing that the card’s depth featuring past UFC titleholders is its selling point.

In essence, UFC 300 may not have the star power of previous milestone events, but its depth and quality fights promise an engaging and memorable evening for fight fans. With matchups like Justin Gaethje vs. Max Holloway on the bill, the event holds immense promise beyond the main event clash.