In the wake of the Supreme Court’s landmark verdict in the electoral bonds case, the digital sphere has been abuzz with commentary and speculation. As both the Centre and the State Bank of India (SBI) raised concerns about the social media fallout, Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud reassured the public that the judiciary remains steadfast in its commitment to upholding the rule of law, despite external pressures.
The recent hearing, presided over by a five-judge Constitution bench led by the CJI, saw Solicitor General Tushar Mehta highlighting the need to address the portrayal of the court’s judgment in the media and on social platforms. Expressing apprehension about deliberate embarrassment and misinformation campaigns, Mehta called for a directive to counteract the manipulation of statistics and narratives.
However, the Chief Justice reiterated the judiciary’s resilience in the face of social media scrutiny, emphasizing that the court’s “shoulders are broad enough” to withstand commentary and criticism. He underscored the judiciary’s role in upholding constitutional principles and ensuring impartiality, regardless of external influences.
Amidst concerns about potential bias or misrepresentation, the Supreme Court remains unwavering in its commitment to judicial independence and integrity. By acknowledging the prevalence of social media discussions surrounding judicial decisions, the court demonstrates its willingness to engage with public discourse while maintaining the sanctity of the legal process.
The Chief Justice’s assertion that once a judgment is delivered, it becomes public property highlights the transparency and accountability inherent in the judicial system. Despite external pressures and scrutiny, the Supreme Court remains steadfast in its dedication to upholding justice and safeguarding democratic principles.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s response to the social media fallout over the electoral bonds verdict reaffirms its role as a guardian of justice and constitutional values. Through thoughtful engagement with public discourse and unwavering commitment to impartiality, the court navigates the complexities of digital scrutiny with poise and integrity.
This blog post reflects on the Supreme Court’s handling of the social media fallout over the electoral bonds verdict, emphasizing its resilience and commitment to upholding the rule of law amidst evolving digital landscapes. As the judiciary continues to navigate external pressures, its dedication to justice and transparency remains unwavering.
